I have just finished reading a few new
things on Germany's catastrophe in the twentieth century, especially
“The Eichmann Trial,” by Deborah Lipstadt, and “The
Language of Silence: West German Literature and the Holocaust,”
by Ernestine Schlant
(Bill Bradley's ex-wife).
The subject currently gets many
references by insecure rich people who are presenting themselves as
unfortunate victims of poor peoples' envy of their wealth, superior
diligence, discipline, intelligence, industriousness, and moral
quality.
The absurdity of those references is
evidence that maybe those people are right who believe that silence
is the only appropriate comment on the horror itself. And yet, as
Schlant says, it needs to be studied and discussed and described!
Both Lipstadt and Schlant are native
German emigrants to the US. Both are academics and Lipstadt worked at
the Holocaust museum in Washington D.C.
The are many thoughts in these two
books that could be discussed forever, but the one that struck me
most strongly was in Lipstadt's chapter on Hannah Arendt's “Eichmann
in Jerusalem.” In particular, it was the idea that Eichmann was
just a banal non-entity, a mindless cog in the system, as Arendt had
it.
Lipstadt has this to say about the
judges decision in the Eichmann case, p. 144:
“In the
final paragraph of their decision, they addressed Eichmann's
character rather than his deeds. He had not offered 'truthful
evidence, in spite of his repeated declarations that...his only
desire was to reveal the truth...his entire testimony was nothing but
one consistent attempt to deny the truth and to conceal his real
share of responsibility.' Even as they declared him a liar, they
offered a back-handed compliment: 'His attempt was not unskillful,
due to those qualities which he had shown at the time of his actions
– an alert mind; the ability to adapt himself to any difficult
situation, cunning and a glib tongue. But he did not have the courage
to confess to the truth.'”
Clever, intelligent, alert, cunning,
skillful people are a dime a dozen. In fact, I have never actually
met Arendt's caricature in my seventy-three years. If you really get
to know such people deeply, you find that they are very sharp indeed.
Again, as I have mentioned before, I find arrogant clever, connected,
learned people like Arendt to be far more harmful that the supposed
stupids they think they see.
I once had the experience of attending
a lecture in Los Angeles in 1965 by Herbert Marcuse entitled “We
Must Revoke the Ninth Symphony.” That title comes from a line
in Thomas Mann's book, “Dr. Faustus,” or “Doktor
Faustus: Das Leben des deutschen Tonsetzers Adrian Leverkühn,
erzählt von einem Freunde.” Mann takes
the crown jewels of German culture, its classical music, and shows
how such a magnificent cultural accomplishment as German classical
music can become catastrophic. Mann's masterpiece makes much more
sense to me than Arendt.
I remember Marcuse saying that he of
all people loves music, but that he looked around him during these
concerts and felt that people “just oozed something I did not
like.”
No comments:
Post a Comment