Hutterites by Dave White |
The Amish, Hutterite,
Mennonite and other radical Protestant groups who emigrated to Canada
and the USA have always had a special attraction for me, particularly
because of their conscientious objection to war, but also because of
their resistance to fads and fashions.
I once delivered to
some Hutterites at a settlement in central Alberta that was fifteen
miles away from the nearest paved road. They were building a barn
together and had ordered some latest technology Insulated Concrete
Forms (“ICF's”), Styrofoam forms for concrete foundations and
walls. It took us a couple hours to unload my truck, during which
time I had the chance to talk with them about their settlement and
thinking. I must say that I have never met a more congenial, decent,
sensible, simpatico group of people in my life. I even inquired as to
whether they ever take in strangers like myself to become members of
their community. Their answer was, “It's very rare.”
My old Mack got stuck
in the mud at the construction site when I tried to leave, so they
came out with this very nice Pay-loader, hooked a big chain on to the
Mack's bumper hooks, and pulled it out. They even offered to have
women come out and wash the mud off the truck for me, but I told them
it would be all dirty again by the time I got back to the paved road.
My getting stuck turned out to be a great adventure with these
Hutterites, but anywhere else it would have been hell, hours wasted,
and calling in some rip-off artist with payments to make on a big
deal wrecker billing me for hundreds of dollars. Hey, you're on your
own, pal.
My own best guess as to
why war is so popular, at least at the time of declaration and during
the run-up to that point, is that it has something to do with group
identification. If you ask during such times whether or not going to
war is wise, the very first response you get is an angry “Whose
side are you on?”
Brian Lamb once interviewed the US Civil War historian and novelist, Shelby Foote.
Shelby Foote was bright, educated, thoughtful and all that good
stuff. But here is a short excerpt from his interview with Brian Lamb
in which he says “my own group, right or wrong.” His fellow
Mississippian, William Faulkner, once said the same thing.
LAMB:
From what you know now and your own political philosophy, if you had
a voice and you lived back there, which side would you have been on?
FOOTE:
There's absolutely no doubt. I'm from Mississippi. I would have been
on the Confederate side. Right or wrong, I would have fought with my
people.
LAMB:
Why?
FOOTE:
Because they're my people. It would have meant the end of my life as
I had known it if I fought on the other side. It would have been a
falsification of everything I'd lived by, even if I opposed it. No
matter how much I was opposed to slavery, I still would have fought
for the Confederacy -- not for slavery, but for other things, such as
freedom to secede from the Union.
“Right or wrong, I
would have fought with my own people.”
Now, I have tried for
many years to understand how so very many intelligent, informed
people like Foote and Faulkner, could say such a thing. It is a very
widespread attitude. You see it prominently in street gangs.
War directly involves
the killing of men, women and children. To be willing to go out with
your group – even when you are wrong - and to kill
men, women and children just because you belong to that group – is
to destroy your own soul and your own people, as well as the lives on
earth of others.
If any of my readers
can suggest to me why Foote and Faulkner are right, and where I am
wrong, please let me know.
No comments:
Post a Comment