“Val doesn't give a sigh what other
people think of him.” My friend said that about me, meaning it as a
compliment. I understood what she meant, and took it that way. But
the exact opposite is the truth.
I've often had the experience of
someone, even a person one-fourth my age, treating me with contempt.
My friend would imagine from my equanimity about it that I “don't
care” about what such people feel about me, but the truth is that I
take these others' viewpoints immediately and seriously, which
enables me to see very clearly that they are inexperienced or
imperceptive. It's impossible for me to give a sigh
over what such people think of me – having put myself in their
shoes!
These reflections are much in my mind
now because I've just read best-selling memoir entitled “The Top Five Regrets of the Dying,” by Bronnie Ware. The “top five
regrets” that she lists are her own choices based on her own
qualitative observations as a home care worker with the dying, rather
than the quantitative results of a scientific survey:
Regret 1: I
wish I'd had the courage to live a life true to myself, not the life
others expected of me
Regret 2: I
wish I hadn't worked so hard
Regret 3: I
wish I'd had the courage to express my feelings
Regret 4: I
wish I had stayed in touch with my friends
Regret 5: I
wish I had let myself be happier
Now, my friend who thinks that I “don't
give a sigh” would understand immediately what Bronnie Ware is
saying here, as have the millions who have read Ware's book and
website. All of the “regrets” express a person's sense of not
having achieved true individuation, true self-knowledge and
integration.
We all know the thing she is trying to
deal with here. But I find this to be just heart-breaking because,
despite all the beautiful, deep perceptions and citations of others
who have tried to deal with it, I don't think that she surmounts the
misunderstanding of the self-other connection, the self-other
paradox.
“Know thyself” is an ancient quest
and is at least one expression of the purpose of
our lives. Self-knowledge is the central part of the Biblical Genesis
teaching and the Greek gnothi seauton tradition and in Egypt
before that.
It's the point and central theme of the
Grail legends, and of fairy tales and of philosopher's stone, and of dreams and of the attempt by depth
psychologists to recover lost and hidden fragments of the self to
re-integrate them. The alchemists wanting to find the true gold was the same thing.
So I ask, why it is that the central
quest of all these generations of highly intelligent and learned
people has yielded, say, George Bush and Barack Obama? What went
wrong, where is the difficulty? Why is achieving self-hood such an all-encompassing, mistake-fraught, difficult, “life-long heroic struggle?”
The implications of this paradox are
infinite. And the vision that immediately comes to me on this, and
about which I hope to write in the future, is that cleverness,
and abstruse, complicated, massive learning is absolutely no closer to resolving it
than complete stupidity.
It think that the “me-me-me” meme
of the last forty-five years is actually a widespread attempt to
resolve the self-other problem, but which has not been successful
because self and other are actually in the same existential field. It has been deflected into selfishness, greed and "Screw you" which is just as unsatisfactory and unworkable as the communism it so vehemently rejects.
No comments:
Post a Comment