Bucky Fuller was an important other for
me along the way. I went to some of his talks in Boston while I was
living there and I just loved his presentations - the spontaneity,
the child-like enthusiasm for his subjects, the openness and
uninhibited passion - as much as the words. He had all these
astonishing inventions and ideas, but he explicitly rejected the suggestion that he was “a genius. ” He said
that, in fact, he was “very ordinary.” He said that we are born
with all kinds of faculties, abilities, but we get “unplugged”
from those capacities as we grow older. “I didn't allow myself
to get unplugged,” he said.
There are four children in the adjacent
houses in my neighborhood who are five years old and who are just
alive with possibility. Bright as can be. I was talking with one of
them about Cinderella and I could see that all the neurons were
firing, none unplugged. She did, I must say, seem to think that the
Disney version was the story. Cinderella in my understanding
exists in some form in most cultures and my version changes each time
I tell it, although I am definitely partial to the Grimm
brothers' telling of it. The Grimms begin the story (Manheim's
translation):
A rich man's
wife fell sick and, feeling her end was near, she called her only
daughter to her bedside and said: “Dear child, be good and say your
prayers; God will help you, and I shall look down on you from heaven
and always be with you.” With that she closed her eyes and died.
Every day the little girl went out to her mother's grave and wept,
and she went on being good and saying her prayers. When winter came,
the snow spread a white cloth over the grave, and when spring took it
off, the man remarried.
Now, even that bit right there has so
much in it for conversation with a five-year-old or a not-unplugged
adult that I just can't stand it. Too much.
* * *
Here is a nice passage from Reading
With Children, by Anne Thaxter Eaton,
first published in 1940, on the subject of bringing books and
children together:
It is not a
simple task. It means knowing children and knowing books so
thoroughly that we may help the dreamer see the wonder and romance of
the world around him, and the matter-of-fact child to enter the realm of imaginative literature...We must have retained or we must
recapture for ourselves something of the child's own attitude toward
life and the world.
Something close to that was very much
at the center of what I was trying to do in my ten years of teaching
and then my ten years of book-selling. I think it's not usually
understood that it is not a simple task because the reader
should believe, if you've done it correctly, that it was all just an
unfolding of what was already within her. It looks as if it was all
done by the student, which is true in a sense, yet setting that up by
a teacher or book-seller or book-giver or book-recommender is often a
task requiring immense reading and experience and empathetic ability. And in the academy, particularly, you have to fight against the widespread but mistaken view that education is the filling of a container rather than the kindling of a fire, as Plutarch put it.
* * *
If you've had a look at Frances Yates'
bibliography, to which I linked in my last post, you could get some
sense of hers being a not-unplugged mind. Here is my favorite photo
of her.
* * *
Dear Val,
ReplyDeleteI am enjoying your blog a lot; it reflects your introspections. You know, solitude is not a curse but a blessing. The thoughts that you are putting into words would not be possible if you had a talking companion next to you, say a parrot...anyway, I would like to know the source of that remarkable photo of Frances Yates with a hat.
I do not completely agree with your definition of science. Where do you leave serendipity?
Anyway, it is late in Beavercreek to blog about this subject. What I really want to let you know is that the thought you rescued from Jung's Memories, Dreams and Reflections, is as you said, a real gem, distilled wisdom.
There is no guarantee – not for a single moment – that we will not fall into error or stumble into deadly peril. We may think there is a sure road. But that would be the road of death. Then nothing happens any longer – at any rate, not the right things. Anyone who takes the sure road is as good as dead.
One should never forget this, an yet, we all forget it because otherwise life would become an impossible trip; we would be killed by anxiety. This is why you cannot think in psychoanalytic terms while you live. I think Jung also said that somewhere.
Cheers
Javier
Dear Javier, I appreciate your comments very much! Thank you. I recognize that the discussion of what is "science" and what is not "science" is an old and challenging discussion, but I hope nonetheless to have something worthwhile to say soon. And here is the source of that great Yates photo:
Deletehttp://www.deannewilliams.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/No-Man%E2%80%99s-Elizabeth-Frances-Yates-and-the-History-of-History.pdf
- Val